Re: [livid-dev] oms release

• To: Patrick Valsecchi <patrick@dante.urbanet.ch>
• Subject: Re: [livid-dev] oms release
• From: "David I. Lehn" <dlehn@vt.edu>
• Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:51:56 -0500
• Cc: livid-dev@linuxvideo.org
• In-Reply-To: <200102011620.RAA03938@dante.urbanet.ch>; from patrick@dante.urbanet.ch on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:20:19PM +0100
• Mail-Followup-To: "David I. Lehn" <dlehn@vt.edu>,Patrick Valsecchi <patrick@dante.urbanet.ch>,livid-dev@linuxvideo.org
• References: <200102011620.RAA03938@dante.urbanet.ch>
• User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i

* Patrick Valsecchi <patrick@dante.urbanet.ch> [20010201 11:21]:
> 
> I have xfree 4.0.2 with a Matrox G400. The X11 output 
> is way much faster than the SDL output (around 24fps 
> for X11 and 19fps for SDL). So if you can keep the X11 
> output I'll be happy.
> 

I haven't tried with OMS, but for mpeg2dec "sdl" is only some fraction
of a percent slower than "xvshm".  And "sdlsw" is -faster- than "xshm"
mode.  I wonder why it would be different for OMS?

-dave
-- 
David I. Lehn <dlehn@vt.edu>  | http://www.lehn.org/~dlehn/
Computer Engineering Graduate @ Virginia Tech in sunny Blacksburg, VA

• References:
  • Re: [livid-dev] oms release
    • From: Patrick Valsecchi <patrick@dante.urbanet.ch>

• Prev by Date: Re: [livid-dev] oms release
• Next by Date: Re: [livid-dev] oms release
• Prev by thread: Re: [livid-dev] oms release
• Next by thread: Re: [livid-dev] oms release
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread