Re: [livid-dev] oms release

• To: livid-dev@linuxvideo.org
• Subject: Re: [livid-dev] oms release
• From: Damian M Gryski <dgryski@uwaterloo.ca>
• Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:30:26 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <m3ofwm8kqq.fsf@localhost.localdomain>; from yoann@mandrakesoft.com on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 16:51:25 +0100
• Mail-Followup-To: livid-dev@linuxvideo.org
• References: <F166QgeDKvPEkGhAj5p00001a8b@hotmail.com> <m3ofwm8kqq.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
• Reply-To: Damian M Gryski <dgryski@uwaterloo.ca>
• Sender: Damian M Gryski <dmg@dmgware.dhs.org>
• User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i

On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> > >- maybe fullscreen x11 output
> > 
> > is this ESSENTIAL?
> 
> If SDL work for everyone : no. :)
> 

   Last time I checked, xine's full screen x11 output with Xv scaling
   was *much* nicer than the streched SDL output from oms.

   For me, bad fullscreen would definately prevent me from using oms.

   Damian

-- 
Damian Gryski ==> dgryski@uwaterloo.ca | Linux, the choice of a GNU generation
512 pt Hacker Test score = 37%         | 500 pt Nerd Test score = 56%
                   geek / linux zealot / coder / juggler

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [livid-dev] oms release
    • From: Dominik 'Aeneas' Schnitzer <dominik@schnitzer.at>

• References:
  • Re: [livid-dev] oms release
    • From: "arthur dent" <bs_2048@hotmail.com>
  • Re: [livid-dev] oms release
    • From: Yoann Vandoorselaere <yoann@mandrakesoft.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: [livid-dev] oms release
• Next by Date: Re: [livid-dev] oms release
• Prev by thread: Re: [livid-dev] oms release
• Next by thread: Re: [livid-dev] oms release
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread